Reliability, validity and fairness in the MRCGP licensing examination

PROJECT TITLE RELIABILITY, VALIDITY AND FAIRNESS IN THE MRCGP LICENSING EXAMINATION
Funding body Royal College of General Practitioners, Health Education England, College of Social Science Research Fund
Total funding £120,000
Team
  • Professor A Niroshan Siriwardena, CaHRU, University of Lincoln
  • Dr Zahid Asghar, CaHRU, University of Lincoln
  • Dr Julie Pattinson, CaHRU, University of Lincoln
  • Dr Vanessa Botan, CaHRU and Nottingham Trent University
  • Dr Joseph Akanuwe, CaHRU, University of Lincoln
  • Prof Graham Law, CaHRU, University of Lincoln
  • Dr Chris Elfes, Dr Susan Bodgener, Dr Kim Emerson, Dr Carol Blow, Dr Jo Richardson, Dr James Larcombe, Dr Katherine A Neden, Dr Amer Salim, Dr David Smalley, Dr Meiling Denney, Prof Rich Withnall, MRCGP examinations
  • Dr Nicki Williams, GP National Reruitment Office
  • Prof Adrian Freeman, Exeter University
  • Prof Lindsey Pope, University of Glasgow
  • Victoria Tzortziou Brown, Garima Priyadarshini, Riya George, Wolfson Institute of  Population Health, Queen Mary University of London
  • Prof Simon Gregory, NHS England
  • Richard Wakeford, University of Cambridge
Team/consortium
  • University of Lincoln
  • Royal College of General Practitioners, London
  • Health Education England GP National Reruitment Office
  • Exeter University
  • University of Glasgow
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • NHS England
  • University of Cambridge
Overarching aim This is a programme of research in collaboration with MRCGP examinations, Health Education England, NHS England and other academic institutions which seeks to investigate its reliability, validity and fairness, including the extent of differential attainment in the examination and its causes.
Objectives
  • To explore the reliability and validity of the MRCGP examination.
  • To explore the extent and causes of differential attainment by sex, ethnicity and disability status of doctors taking the MRCGP examination.
  • To review the literature on differential attainment related to the MRCGP examination
Methods Systematic review, cross sectional data linkage, questionnaire and qualitative studies.
Outcomes
  • Extent of differential attainment by sex, ethnicity, country of primary medical training, disability or other protected characteristic.
  • Determinants of differential attainment.
Outputs Peer reviewed publications, conference presentations and recommendations for the MRCGP examination and candidates.

Peer reviewed publications

Conference presentations

  • Siriwardena AN, Botan V, Laparidou D, Phung VH, Cheung P, Freeman A, Wakeford R, Denney M, Law GR. Candidate perceptions of the UK Recorded Consultation Assessment introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional study. Oral presentation online at Society for Academic Primary Care, Annual Scientific Meeting 30 June-1 July 2021, University of Leeds.
  • Siriwardena AN, Botan V, Laparidou D, Phung VH, Cheung P, Freeman A, Wakeford R, Denney M, Law GR. Examiner perceptions of the UK Recorded Consultation Assessment introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional study. Poster presentation online at Society for Academic Primary Care, Annual Scientific Meeting 30 June-1 July 2021, University of Leeds.
  • Siriwardena AN, Botan V, Laparidou D, Phung VH, Cheung P, Freeman A, Wakeford R, Denney M, Law GR. Examiner perceptions of the UK Recorded Consultation Assessment introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional study. Oral presentation online at AMEE 27 -30 August 2021.

Podcasts and videos

Impact These studies seek to understand how the reliability and validity of the examination can be maintained or improved, why differential attainment exists and what we can do to address it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*